<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transport shorts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/2009/02/transport-shorts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/2009/02/transport-shorts/</link>
	<description>commentary on all things Taiwanese — Taiwan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 17:43:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Webb</title>
		<link>http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/2009/02/transport-shorts/comment-page-1/#comment-84754</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 03:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/?p=3491#comment-84754</guid>
		<description>To counter your &quot;Chen Yunlin&quot; argument, the pandas (also a security concern) were flown into Sungshan. :)

David, this is what happens...what *really* happens at Sungshan airport security-wise and what I actually witness at least once a month. It used to be more often when Chen Shui-Bien was president because his son-in-law(?) lived on Fu-Jin street, too.

Security concerns don&#039;t exit FuXing. They exit via the airbase entrance and go down GuangFu, which is bordered on one side by a high wall and has very little access from the other side (2 minor residential streets and Min-Chuan). There is very little traffic. Police are stationed at each corner to control the traffic lights so that the group (and it&#039;s always a stereotypical group...black cars with blacked out windows flanked by police), have green lights all the way down.

I deal with this going to work, since I take GuangFu N. Rd all the way to ChungXiao from my home on the regular basis, which is why I keep raising the security concern. I know how the plan works from this end.

See you later today! I&#039;m bringing a 60 year-old relic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To counter your &#8220;Chen Yunlin&#8221; argument, the pandas (also a security concern) were flown into Sungshan. <img src='http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>David, this is what happens&#8230;what *really* happens at Sungshan airport security-wise and what I actually witness at least once a month. It used to be more often when Chen Shui-Bien was president because his son-in-law(?) lived on Fu-Jin street, too.</p>
<p>Security concerns don&#8217;t exit FuXing. They exit via the airbase entrance and go down GuangFu, which is bordered on one side by a high wall and has very little access from the other side (2 minor residential streets and Min-Chuan). There is very little traffic. Police are stationed at each corner to control the traffic lights so that the group (and it&#8217;s always a stereotypical group&#8230;black cars with blacked out windows flanked by police), have green lights all the way down.</p>
<p>I deal with this going to work, since I take GuangFu N. Rd all the way to ChungXiao from my home on the regular basis, which is why I keep raising the security concern. I know how the plan works from this end.</p>
<p>See you later today! I&#8217;m bringing a 60 year-old relic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Reid</title>
		<link>http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/2009/02/transport-shorts/comment-page-1/#comment-84753</link>
		<dc:creator>David Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 13:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/?p=3491#comment-84753</guid>
		<description>Brian,

I am not really clear what you mean by security. Distance from the city centre is only one factor involved in security. And as far as travelling from the airport to the city centre goes it is possible to go directly onto a freeway from Taoyuan Airport which is much safer than driving out of Songshan Airport into a traffic jam on Fuxing North Road. To provide further evidence for my case when Chen Yunlin came to Taiwan he landed at Taoyuan Airport. I am sure security issues were a major factor in that decision. 

I know you enjoy playing the devil&#039;s advocate, but at least you say you would enjoy a large park near your home. I am sure most of your neighbours would too and it would bring far more benefits to everyone than the airport currently does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>I am not really clear what you mean by security. Distance from the city centre is only one factor involved in security. And as far as travelling from the airport to the city centre goes it is possible to go directly onto a freeway from Taoyuan Airport which is much safer than driving out of Songshan Airport into a traffic jam on Fuxing North Road. To provide further evidence for my case when Chen Yunlin came to Taiwan he landed at Taoyuan Airport. I am sure security issues were a major factor in that decision. </p>
<p>I know you enjoy playing the devil&#8217;s advocate, but at least you say you would enjoy a large park near your home. I am sure most of your neighbours would too and it would bring far more benefits to everyone than the airport currently does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Webb</title>
		<link>http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/2009/02/transport-shorts/comment-page-1/#comment-84751</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/?p=3491#comment-84751</guid>
		<description>Distance is a security issue, isn&#039;t it? My meaning is, if an &quot;insert-person-who-needs-security&quot; is visiting, say, President Ma, wouldn&#039;t a shorter route be a more secure one?

Is CKS used as a permanent military airfield, too? If so, then I agree that closing the military operations at Sungshan is doable. Remember though, that the air force is the most important component in Taiwan&#039;s military. Taiwan has the largest per-capita air force in the world for a specific reason: it&#039;s the best defense against any type of PRC (military) offensive.

That being said, if CKS is also doubling as a permanent (not temporary-in-time-of-need) housing and launching point for air force craft and operations, then Sungshan really isn&#039;t needed. 

I would enjoy a Da-An-sized park just a few blocks from my home, especially since my twins just learned how to ride bikes and it would give my community (also rated the greenest in Taipei city last year) a second large park (the other being Min-Sheng park).

Oh, on the ferry vs. aircraft carbon emissions thing...it all would come down to how many people would each ferry carry vs. how many people the aircraft would. My guess, assuming the links prove popular and so you could constantly fill seats, is that aircraft would have a lower per-person carbon footprint. It could be made even lower by mixing bio-fuel in with the kerosene(jet fuel) as some airliners are already doing. But of course bio-fuel has it&#039;s own issues depending on the source.

But that&#039;s just a guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Distance is a security issue, isn&#8217;t it? My meaning is, if an &#8220;insert-person-who-needs-security&#8221; is visiting, say, President Ma, wouldn&#8217;t a shorter route be a more secure one?</p>
<p>Is CKS used as a permanent military airfield, too? If so, then I agree that closing the military operations at Sungshan is doable. Remember though, that the air force is the most important component in Taiwan&#8217;s military. Taiwan has the largest per-capita air force in the world for a specific reason: it&#8217;s the best defense against any type of PRC (military) offensive.</p>
<p>That being said, if CKS is also doubling as a permanent (not temporary-in-time-of-need) housing and launching point for air force craft and operations, then Sungshan really isn&#8217;t needed. </p>
<p>I would enjoy a Da-An-sized park just a few blocks from my home, especially since my twins just learned how to ride bikes and it would give my community (also rated the greenest in Taipei city last year) a second large park (the other being Min-Sheng park).</p>
<p>Oh, on the ferry vs. aircraft carbon emissions thing&#8230;it all would come down to how many people would each ferry carry vs. how many people the aircraft would. My guess, assuming the links prove popular and so you could constantly fill seats, is that aircraft would have a lower per-person carbon footprint. It could be made even lower by mixing bio-fuel in with the kerosene(jet fuel) as some airliners are already doing. But of course bio-fuel has it&#8217;s own issues depending on the source.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s just a guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Reid</title>
		<link>http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/2009/02/transport-shorts/comment-page-1/#comment-84750</link>
		<dc:creator>David Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/?p=3491#comment-84750</guid>
		<description>Brian,

Ideally the airport would be closed completely including the military operations. I realise that this does raise an additional issue for consideration of future use of the site though. 

I think security at Taoyuan would actually be much better as it is a modern airport designed to higher standards. The cases you mention are for the sake of convenience not security. 

Noise may not be a big issue particularly since the number of flights has declined significantly in recent years. The key point is that more people would benefit from living next to a park than an airport. It is a simple utilitarian argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>Ideally the airport would be closed completely including the military operations. I realise that this does raise an additional issue for consideration of future use of the site though. </p>
<p>I think security at Taoyuan would actually be much better as it is a modern airport designed to higher standards. The cases you mention are for the sake of convenience not security. </p>
<p>Noise may not be a big issue particularly since the number of flights has declined significantly in recent years. The key point is that more people would benefit from living next to a park than an airport. It is a simple utilitarian argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Webb</title>
		<link>http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/2009/02/transport-shorts/comment-page-1/#comment-84749</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/?p=3491#comment-84749</guid>
		<description>Oh, and see you Sunday!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and see you Sunday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Webb</title>
		<link>http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/2009/02/transport-shorts/comment-page-1/#comment-84748</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Webb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/?p=3491#comment-84748</guid>
		<description>Hey David, just to make a couple of quick comments on the Sungshan airport issue since I live in the area.

1) Removing the airport would *not* allow for building height restrictions to be removed and probably wouldn&#039;t allow for a lot of additional commercial development. The reason is, there is a very large air force base right next door.

2) Security. This is sort-of related to the &quot;China&quot; routes going there. Being smaller, being located right in the city, and with the military base right next door, it commonly used for stars, dignitaries, etc... .  In fact, that&#039;s the airport they flew the pandas in to for that very reason. 

Because the takeoff direction of the runway is toward the undeveloped area of Neihu/the river and not the Sungshan area and Taipei, the noise pollution isn&#039;t bad at all. The sound of the cars and scooters is worse. Actually, when I lived in San Chung, which is under the landing pattern of CKS, was a LOT worse. Where I live on FuJin St, &gt;1km east of Sungshan airport, it&#039;s relatively quiet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey David, just to make a couple of quick comments on the Sungshan airport issue since I live in the area.</p>
<p>1) Removing the airport would *not* allow for building height restrictions to be removed and probably wouldn&#8217;t allow for a lot of additional commercial development. The reason is, there is a very large air force base right next door.</p>
<p>2) Security. This is sort-of related to the &#8220;China&#8221; routes going there. Being smaller, being located right in the city, and with the military base right next door, it commonly used for stars, dignitaries, etc&#8230; .  In fact, that&#8217;s the airport they flew the pandas in to for that very reason. </p>
<p>Because the takeoff direction of the runway is toward the undeveloped area of Neihu/the river and not the Sungshan area and Taipei, the noise pollution isn&#8217;t bad at all. The sound of the cars and scooters is worse. Actually, when I lived in San Chung, which is under the landing pattern of CKS, was a LOT worse. Where I live on FuJin St, &gt;1km east of Sungshan airport, it&#8217;s relatively quiet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

