Indigenous rights and the Smangus case
Today's Taipei Times reports that the Taiwan High Court sentenced three men from the village of Smangus to three months in prison for removing a fallen tree. The sentence was suspended for two years, but the men were still required to pay a fine of NT$79,000 each. The men were appealing an earlier sentence and plan a further appeal to the Supreme Court.
I wrote about this issue in May of this year noting, "this case really goes to the heart of the rights of indigenous people, not just in Taiwan, but throughout the world." For more background on the case please see the blog of the Smangus community. Smangus is an Atayal village in the mountains of Xinzhu County.
Another article in today's Taipei Times addresses issues relating to indigenous peoples' rights and the law in Taiwan. In response to the UN General Assembly adopting the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Minister of the Council of Indigenous Peoples Icyang Parod urged the legislature to pass more legislation related to the Aboriginal Basic Law (原住民族基本法). Quoting from the article:
"About 90 percent of the content in the declaration is already covered in our Aboriginal Basic Law," Icyang said at a news conference. "We're working toward the same goal, and thus we welcome the adoption."
However, Icyang also urged the legislature to collaborate to better provide better protection of Aboriginal rights.
"Despite the passage of the Aboriginal Basic Law, we still need 10 pieces of sublegislation to provide details on its execution," he said.
For instance, the law protects Aborigines' right to land in their traditional tribal domains, but the boundaries of the domains need to be clarified, Icyang said.
It is good in one way that Taiwan has put some legislation in place that protects indigenous rights. However, the Smangus case shows that in practice some basic rights are still not protected by the law.
Update: Michael Turton and I-fan Lin at Global Voices have also blogged on this issue.
Smangus and the tree stump
High Court delivers not guilty verdict in Smangus case
End of the last semester at NCCU
Supreme Court repeals verdict in Smangus case
The right to live in the forest
Posted: September 29th, 2007 under Environment, Hsinchu, Human rights, News & media, Taiwan.
Tags: atayal, indigenous rights, smangus
Comments
Pingback from David on Formosa » Links 22 October 2007
Time 22 October 2007 at 9:14 am
[...] Media: The Taipei Times on Friday reported that the Council of Indigenous Peoples (CIP) has defined the boundaries of Aboriginal communities and set guidelines for the collection of forest products. This is in response to the Smangus case. [...]
Pingback from David on Formosa » What I am studying this semester
Time 26 October 2007 at 8:10 am
[...] have developed in recent history. My main motivation for studying this topic is as a result of the Smangus case which will be the case study for the [...]
Comment from Ashish
Time 22 April 2008 at 4:23 pm
Hi David, If I haven’t mentioned it before then here it is. I read your posts on Smangus case before when MJ had mentioned about them in his weekly picks series . I went through most of them and found it quite informative. I’m no expert on the case or laws but I must appreciate you efforts to do the research and give voice to the Smangus people on your blog. You are doing a great job














Pingback from David on Formosa » 2007 Ethnographic Film Festival
Time 2 October 2007 at 11:27 pm
[...] Indigenous rights and the Smangus case [...]