<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recommended website #3: Pinyin.info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/2006/10/recommended-website-3-pinyininfo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/2006/10/recommended-website-3-pinyininfo/</link>
	<description>commentary on all things Taiwanese -- Taichung, Taiwan</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:20:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/2006/10/recommended-website-3-pinyininfo/comment-page-1/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 21:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/2006/10/recommended-website-3-pinyininfo/#comment-254</guid>
		<description>Interesting... I found a different side to be controversial.  Pretty much all of the readings he puts up are from De Francis and a number of other academics from an extreme anti-character group.  

His opinions are clearly well informed, but he keeps saying things like &quot;as long as Chinese characters are the sole accepted script for the vast majority of people in China, they&#039;ll have terrible illiteracy problems[sic]&quot;.  He also seems quite sure that the Japanese and Taiwanese have a lot of literacy problems, too. It&#039;s clear that he wants to see &lt;i&gt;Chinese&lt;/i&gt; people using &lt;i&gt;our&lt;/i&gt; orthography to write &lt;i&gt;their&lt;/i&gt; language.  And &lt;b&gt;that&lt;/b&gt; is the part of his site I found controversial.  That some assertions about post WWII Japanese Ocupation history.

http://www.pinyin.info/readings/texts/ideographic_myth.html
http://pinyin.info/news/2006/chinese-literacy/
http://pinyin.info/news/2006/more-claims-on-eliminating-illiteracy-in-china/
http://pinyin.info/news/2006/campaign-poster-zhuyin-and-the-color-purple/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8230; I found a different side to be controversial.  Pretty much all of the readings he puts up are from De Francis and a number of other academics from an extreme anti-character group.  </p>
<p>His opinions are clearly well informed, but he keeps saying things like &#8220;as long as Chinese characters are the sole accepted script for the vast majority of people in China, they&#8217;ll have terrible illiteracy problems[sic]&#8220;.  He also seems quite sure that the Japanese and Taiwanese have a lot of literacy problems, too. It&#8217;s clear that he wants to see <i>Chinese</i> people using <i>our</i> orthography to write <i>their</i> language.  And <b>that</b> is the part of his site I found controversial.  That some assertions about post WWII Japanese Ocupation history.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pinyin.info/readings/texts/ideographic_myth.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pinyin.info/readings/texts/ideographic_myth.html</a><br />
<a href="http://pinyin.info/news/2006/chinese-literacy/" rel="nofollow">http://pinyin.info/news/2006/chinese-literacy/</a><br />
<a href="http://pinyin.info/news/2006/more-claims-on-eliminating-illiteracy-in-china/" rel="nofollow">http://pinyin.info/news/2006/more-claims-on-eliminating-illiteracy-in-china/</a><br />
<a href="http://pinyin.info/news/2006/campaign-poster-zhuyin-and-the-color-purple/" rel="nofollow">http://pinyin.info/news/2006/campaign-poster-zhuyin-and-the-color-purple/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/2006/10/recommended-website-3-pinyininfo/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 16:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taiwan-guide.org/2006/10/recommended-website-3-pinyininfo/#comment-251</guid>
		<description>Yes, I also think that pinyin.info has a controversial side, speciall against  bopomofo, Taiwan and some taiwanese romanization issues, I recognize that pinyin is useful, but if taiwanese use bomopofo is totally correct, &quot;when in Rome, do as romans do&quot;...

See Ya</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I also think that pinyin.info has a controversial side, speciall against  bopomofo, Taiwan and some taiwanese romanization issues, I recognize that pinyin is useful, but if taiwanese use bomopofo is totally correct, &#8220;when in Rome, do as romans do&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>See Ya</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
